Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Discussions covering the components and techniques of reloading for your handgun.
jloader
Posts: 156
Joined: 12 Apr 2016 13:13
My Press Choice: Progressive
Location: SE Michigan
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by jloader »

Here's a bright idea :idea: - not!

The setup is for S&W 38 SPL.
So, I've read in a few places on Internet (the source of all truth :roll: ), that you could just press your Round-nose bullet backwards (round side into the casing) to get a nice wad cutter bullet. Just watch not to compress the powder, but that was no issue since I'm using TiteGroup (3.2 grn)

Being the wiser, I've loaded a batch of just 20 of those using minimum powder load. And they looked right too.
Took them to the range and gave them some fire at 10 yards...
I never claim to be a great shot, but out of those 20, about 10 landed somewhere on the 8.5x11 sheet.

On the bright side, they did make a nice round holes...

I was skeptical to start with, especially with the base of the bullet being now round - what happens to the distribution of pressure in the case? It is no longer downwards towards the base of the case, but instead spread around the walls. I think I'm onto something here - one of the cases split at the top.

That made my decision to purchase Lee SWC mold much easier...
User avatar
Ranch Dog
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 Jun 2013 17:16
My Press Choice: Progressive
Location: Inez, TX
Has thanked: 1616 times
Been thanked: 2850 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by Ranch Dog »

I've read it but never had the need to try it. You saved me the trouble should the need ever arise.
Michael
Image
User avatar
farmerjim
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 315
Joined: 29 Jan 2015 14:27
My Press Choice: Turret
Location: Saint Francisville LA
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 114 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by farmerjim »

I have also seen this on the internet. Thank you for trying it, now I don't have to. Why the SWC and not the full wad cutter?
jloader
Posts: 156
Joined: 12 Apr 2016 13:13
My Press Choice: Progressive
Location: SE Michigan
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by jloader »

Why SWC instead of WC? Want to go with lighter bullet, Lee has WC at 158 grn and SWC at 105 grn. My hope is that the lighter projectile will have lesser kick - I'm using S&W J-frame revolver. With 158 grn bullet the wrist starts to hurt after 50 rounds affecting the accuracy; after 100 it's quite painful. OK, so I'm a wimp.
I'm looking at 3.0-3.2 grn of TiteGroup powder to start with.
User avatar
mr surveyor
Founding Member
Founding Member
Posts: 649
Joined: 30 Jun 2013 09:30
My Press Choice: Hand Press
Location: NE Texas
Has thanked: 385 times
Been thanked: 231 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by mr surveyor »

jloader wrote:Why SWC instead of WC? Want to go with lighter bullet, Lee has WC at 158 grn and SWC at 105 grn. My hope is that the lighter projectile will have lesser kick - I'm using S&W J-frame revolver. With 158 grn bullet the wrist starts to hurt after 50 rounds affecting the accuracy; after 100 it's quite painful. OK, so I'm a wimp.
I'm looking at 3.0-3.2 grn of TiteGroup powder to start with.

are you sure about those dropped bullet weights from the Lee molds?


just asking.


jd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's just some things best left unsaid on the internetsuperhighway.
User avatar
Poppop
250 Shots
250 Shots
Posts: 262
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 16:15
My Press Choice: Turret
Location: Easton, PA
Has thanked: 82 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by Poppop »

jloader wrote:Why SWC instead of WC? Want to go with lighter bullet, Lee has WC at 158 grn and SWC at 105 grn. My hope is that the lighter projectile will have lesser kick - I'm using S&W J-frame revolver. With 158 grn bullet the wrist starts to hurt after 50 rounds affecting the accuracy; after 100 it's quite painful. OK, so I'm a wimp.
I'm looking at 3.0-3.2 grn of TiteGroup powder to start with.

A lighter projectile will need more powder . Wouldn't that be more kick? I also have a J frame 3" bbl and shoot it S/A using 158 gr SWC - Bullseye Powder in low 3 gr area and doesn't hurt at all PLUS better accuracy. Try it
If all else fails--look for the obvious
MAGA
User avatar
GasGuzzler
Moderator & Supporter
Moderator & Supporter
Posts: 2035
Joined: 26 Jan 2016 22:39
My Press Choice: Turret
Location: Cooke County, TX
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 500 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by GasGuzzler »

Poppop wrote:
jloader wrote:Why SWC instead of WC? Want to go with lighter bullet, Lee has WC at 158 grn and SWC at 105 grn. My hope is that the lighter projectile will have lesser kick - I'm using S&W J-frame revolver. With 158 grn bullet the wrist starts to hurt after 50 rounds affecting the accuracy; after 100 it's quite painful. OK, so I'm a wimp.
I'm looking at 3.0-3.2 grn of TiteGroup powder to start with.

A lighter projectile will need more powder . Wouldn't that be more kick? I also have a J frame 3" bbl and shoot it S/A using 158 gr SWC - Bullseye Powder in low 3 gr area and doesn't hurt at all PLUS better accuracy. Try it
This^

Also a 125 gr with a little more Bullseye also works well, no kick from my snubby M88.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from goin' insane.
Ohio3Wheels
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 888
Joined: 06 Mar 2016 16:09
My Press Choice: Hand Press
Location: SW Ohio
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 240 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by Ohio3Wheels »

A grain or two of powder hardly maters in the scheme of things recoil wise it's the extra velocity that may even things out. Sometimes changing the grip will make all the difference in the world as to felt recoil. I've long been a fan of Pachmeyer DeCelerators particularly on the boomers.

Make smoke, comfortably,
Curt.......makin' smoke and raising my carbon foot print one cartridge at a time +guns +guns
User avatar
GasGuzzler
Moderator & Supporter
Moderator & Supporter
Posts: 2035
Joined: 26 Jan 2016 22:39
My Press Choice: Turret
Location: Cooke County, TX
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 500 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by GasGuzzler »

I'll never put something so ugly as aftermarket pistol grips on. To each his own.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from goin' insane.
62chevy
Founding Member
Founding Member
Posts: 1617
Joined: 17 Oct 2013 18:09
My Press Choice: Turret
Location: West Virginia
Has thanked: 1017 times
Been thanked: 323 times

Re: Cheap man's Wad-cutter - fail

Post by 62chevy »

Poppop wrote:
jloader wrote:Why SWC instead of WC? Want to go with lighter bullet, Lee has WC at 158 grn and SWC at 105 grn. My hope is that the lighter projectile will have lesser kick - I'm using S&W J-frame revolver. With 158 grn bullet the wrist starts to hurt after 50 rounds affecting the accuracy; after 100 it's quite painful. OK, so I'm a wimp.
I'm looking at 3.0-3.2 grn of TiteGroup powder to start with.

A lighter projectile will need more powder . Wouldn't that be more kick? I also have a J frame 3" bbl and shoot it S/A using 158 gr SWC - Bullseye Powder in low 3 gr area and doesn't hurt at all PLUS better accuracy. Try it
No a lighter bullet will give you less kick. I was using a 160 grain Lee 452-160-RF with very little recoil that even my Wife would shoot it. after going with the Lee 452-200-RF and less powder the recoil went up. I was able to drop the charge of Bullseye by 1.4 grains. Guess it takes more energy to get the heavier bullet moving.

Oh and the Wife refuses to shoot it now.
Je suis Charlie
Post Reply

Return to “Handgun Reloading”